Redefine Statistical Significance
Author(s)
- Daniel J Benjamin
- James O Berger
- Magnus Johannesson
- Brian A Nosek
- E. J Wagenmakers
- Richard Berk
- Kenneth A Bollen
- Bjorn Brembs
- Lawrence Brown
- Colin F Camerer
- David Cesarini
- Christopher D. Chambers
- Merlise Clyde
- Thomas D Cook
- Paul De Boeck
- Zoltan Dienes
- Anna Dreber
- Kenny Easwaran
- Charles Efferson
- Ernst Fehr
- Fiona Fidler
- Andy P. Field
- Malcom Forster
- Edward I. George
- Tarun Ramadorai
- Richard Gonzalez
- Steven Goodman
- Edwin Green
- Donald P Green
- Anthony Greenwald
- Jarrod D. Hadfield
- Larry V. Hedges
- Leonhard Held
- Teck Hau Ho
- Herbert Hoijtink
- James Holland Jones
- Daniel J Hruschka
- Kosuke Imai
- Guido Imbens
- John P.A. Ioannidis
- Minjeong Jeon
- Michael Kirchler
- David Laibson
- John A List
- Roderick Little
- Arthur Lupia
- Edouard Machery
- Scott E. Maxwell
- Michael McCarthy
- Don Moore
- Stephen L. Morgan
- Marcus Munafo
- Shinichi Nakagawa
- Brendan Nyhan
- Timothy H Parker
- Luis Pericchi
- Marco Perugini
- Jeff Rouder
- Judith Rousseau
- Victoria Savalei
- Felix D. Schonbrodt
- Thomas Sellke
- Betsy Sinclair
- Dustin Tingley
- Trisha Van Zandt
- Simine Vazire
- Duncan J. Watts
- Christopher Winship
- Robert L. Wolpert
- Yu Xie
- Cristobal Young
- Jonathan Zinman
- Valen E. Johnson
Full TextAbstract
We propose to change the default P-value threshold for statistical significance for claims of new discoveries from 0.05 to 0.005.